<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://wiki.cinejeu.net/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>A Report The Folly of PEG Ratio - Historique des versions</title>
		<link>https://wiki.cinejeu.net/index.php?title=A_Report_The_Folly_of_PEG_Ratio&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Historique pour cette page sur le wiki</description>
		<language>fr</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:17:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>Gaugeframe0&amp;nbsp;:&amp;#32;a Report The Folly of PEG Ratio</title>
			<link>https://wiki.cinejeu.net/index.php?title=A_Report_The_Folly_of_PEG_Ratio&amp;diff=103478&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;a Report The Folly of PEG Ratio&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nouvelle page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Price Earning Growth (PEG) Ratio may be the rate of a company's P/E with its growth rate. Lots of experts have concurred that a stock is rather valued when its PEG rate similar one. This means that in case a stock features a P/E of 10 with a rate of 10%, then the stock is trading at fair value. Exactly how many of you have seen this kind of statement? I have seen it lots of times and I think it is ridiculous. This is a easy thought. Let's think about it for another. If a stock can grow its gaining for 2 months, then to reach fair value, the stock needs to trade at a P/E of 8. Think about a stock with growth rate of five minutes? Its fair value is really a P/E Of 5. How about a business with 0% growth? Oh, right. According to this concept, the company needs to have a of 0, or worthless. Does sense is made by this? Heck, no. But there are certainly a lot of articles regarding this PEG idea. Listed here are many resources of commonly misunderstood PEG ratio: a 0% growth company, the fair P/E rate for the company isn't 0. Instead, it's several percent above risk-free interest or a twenty year treasury bond. Then a fair value of a standard stock are at 7.6% yield, If a five year bond is yielding 4.6%. Inverting this produce, we get a P/E ratio of 13.2. Whatever else is wrong with using PEG ratio to determine the fair value of a standard stock? PEG assumes infinite growth rate in earning per share. If you are interested in politics, you will maybe need to learn about  [http://people.csail.mit.edu/zeyuan/reading/index.php?title=The_Myth_Of_Gaining_Muscle_Without_having_Fat_67943 biotrust ic-5 review] . No business can develop at exactly the same rate forever. What is the reasonable value of the normal stock using PEG ratio, if we assume company A will grow at 10% rate for another five years and then growth slows to the next day consistently? The answer could it be can't do this. PEG ratio is far too an easy task to single-handedly assign a reasonable price for a common stock. It's simply wrong and inaccurate to use PEG ratio for our fair value calculation.  [http://ameblo.jp/roofmaraca12/entry-11566710046.html Mike Chang Workout Program]  includes additional resources concerning why to acknowledge it. Good sense dictates that the investment with higher growth rate must be valued at a higher P/E rate. There is nothing wrong with that. But as a good value of a standard stock utilizing a simple PEG ratio of one is simply wrong. I really do not have an accurate way to calculate this but an estimation may be keep reading other articles entitled Calculating Fair Value with Growth and Fair Value with Negative Growth.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:01:20 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Gaugeframe0</dc:creator>			<comments>https://wiki.cinejeu.net/index.php?title=Discussion:A_Report_The_Folly_of_PEG_Ratio</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>