<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://wiki.cinejeu.net/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="fr">
		<id>https://wiki.cinejeu.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=A_Review_Wikipedia_And_The_Nofollow_Controversy</id>
		<title>A Review Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy - Historique des versions</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.cinejeu.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=A_Review_Wikipedia_And_The_Nofollow_Controversy"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.cinejeu.net/index.php?title=A_Review_Wikipedia_And_The_Nofollow_Controversy&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-18T14:10:18Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Historique pour cette page sur le wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.cinejeu.net/index.php?title=A_Review_Wikipedia_And_The_Nofollow_Controversy&amp;diff=156838&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Numbersofa0&amp;nbsp;:&amp;#32;a Review Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.cinejeu.net/index.php?title=A_Review_Wikipedia_And_The_Nofollow_Controversy&amp;diff=156838&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2013-08-24T14:26:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;a Review Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nouvelle page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;If you are not active in the seo group, January 21st, 2007 probably held no significance for you. If you know anything at all, you will likely require to explore about  [http://blog.goo.ne.jp/loancoast8/e/bb15dcfefbf568b38092e9eaeee5b653 web developer adelaide] . However, if you're an internet search engine marketer or SEO, you possibly remember January 21st as the time that Wikipedia died. To the inexperienced eye, Wikipedia is exactly the same today since it was 6 months ago. But, once you take a look and get below the top, you can easily see one difference that has had an impact on the planet of se optimization: NOFOLLOW. In what of Matt Cutts, &amp;amp;quot;rel=&amp;amp;quot;nofollow&amp;amp;quot; credit is definitely an simple way for a site to tell se's that the web site cant or doesnt want to vouch for a link.&amp;amp;quot; Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was mainly used for blog comments. That served weblog owners reduce comment spam. Get further on an affiliated use with by visiting  [http://my.opera.com/burgljl772/blog/2013/08/14/a-company-website-that-you-can-make-yourself tell us what you think] . NOFOLLOW was also used in some situations to represent a link, but this is a whole other dispute that will have to be preserved for an alternative report. On each confident link the reason that Wikipedias use of NOFOLLOW caused this type of stir is because many individuals viewed it whilst the most hypocritical decision that Wikipedia may have made. The main reason that Wikipedia has become so common and performs so well in the SERPs is that writers and website owners frequently research Wikipedia. They supply a link back to Wikipedia, when they do that. To get different interpretations, please consider checking out:  [http://www.rdatoolkit.org/event/7562 official website] . Every time that process occurs, Wikipedia gets a bit more acceptance in the major search engines. In case you need to get further on  [http://www.davidmakaio.com/search-engine-optimization-tips-for-optimizing-your-site-for-search-engines/ Search Engine Optimization- Tips For Optimizing Your Site For Search Engines | Davi] , there are many online libraries you should think about pursuing. When Wikipedia decided to implement the NOFOLLOW draw, they are telling the major search engines that while we reference a site and may use information from it inside our article, we do not want one to give it any credit. It is because of this that numerous have started initially to view Wikipedia as a huge hypocrisy. Even though NOFOLLOW has probably lessen the amount of spam Wikipedia has to fight, but as numerous the others have mentioned, Wikipedia could have chosen a different way for fighting spam that did not punish quality the web sites which deserve to be acquiesced by Wikipedia.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Numbersofa0</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>