Voir le texte source
De WikiCinéjeu.
pour
Wikipedia-And-The-Nofollow-Controversy-95321
Aller à :
Navigation
,
rechercher
If you are not involved in the search engine optimization community, January 21st, 2007 possibly held no significance for you. Even so, if you are a search engine marketer or Search engine marketing, you almost certainly bear in mind January 21st as the day that Wikipedia died. To the untrained eye, Wikipedia is precisely the exact same today as it was six months ago. But, when you dig beneath the surface and take a appear, you can see one particular difference that has had an effect on the world of search engine optimization: NOFOLLOW. In the words of Matt Cutts, "rel="nofollow" attribute is an effortless way for a net web site to inform search engines that the internet website cant or doesnt want to vouch for a hyperlink." Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was mainly employed for weblog comments. This helped weblog owners cut down on comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also used in some conditions to denote a paid link, but this is a whole other controversy that will have to be saved for a diverse write-up. [http://www.jackpot-mansion.com/2013/05/04/great-ideas-on-search-engine-optimization-and-search-engine-optimization-solutions/ orange county seo youtube] [http://www.purevolume.com/pagetailor3/posts/4341791/How+Refunds+Can+Increase+Your+Sales%3F+ iphone app development services] [https://groups.diigo.com/group/pauliujtairowikensby/content/advantages-of-a-life-insurance-policy-9782329 Advantages of a Life Insurance Policy | Diigo Groups] The cause that Wikipedias adoption of NOFOLLOW on each and every single outgoing link brought on such a stir is since a lot of people viewed it as the most hypocritical selection that Wikipedia could have produced. The cause that Wikipedia has grow to be so well-liked and performs so nicely in the SERPs is that bloggers and internet site owners frequently reference Wikipedia. When they do this, they offer a link back to Wikipedia. Each time that this method happens, Wikipedia gains a little more recognition in the search engines. When Wikipedia decided to implement the NOFOLLOW tag, they are telling the search engines that despite the fact that we reference a net web site and might use content from it in our write-up, we do not want you to give it any credit. It is for this purpose that several have began to view Wikipedia as a enormous hypocrisy. [http://www.xfire.com/blog/kevinbrick4/4634735/ tumbshots] Even though NOFOLLOW has possibly reduce down on the quantity of spam Wikipedia has to combat, but as several other individuals have stated, Wikipedia could have selected a different method for fighting spam that did not punish high quality web web sites which deserve to be recognized by Wikipedia.
Revenir à la page
Wikipedia-And-The-Nofollow-Controversy-95321
.
Affichages
Page
Discussion
Voir le texte source
Historique
Outils personnels
Créer un compte ou se connecter
Navigation
Accueil
Cinéjeu
Forum
Modifications récentes
Page au hasard
Aide
Rechercher
Boîte à outils
Pages liées
Suivi des pages liées
Pages spéciales