Voir le texte source

== Vettel finally wins his first German Grand Prix ==

<html>Vettel finally wins his first German Grand Prix{eot}The Canadian Press7/7/2013 2:02:31 PMText Size
NUERBURGRING, Germany -- Pushed hard by a driver who may become his teammate, Sebastian Vettel finally won at home in Germany in a race that featured some scary moments Sunday.
The three-time defending Formula One champion surged ahead in his Red Bull by the first curve and then had to resist the challenge of two fast Lotus cars. He took the checkered flag a second ahead of Kimi Raikkonen, who is being mentioned as Vettel's possible future colleague.
 It was a tough race. It was one of the toughest for a long time, Vettel said after his fourth victory of the season. I am happy the race was 60 laps and not 61 or 62,[http://www.361-du.com/plus/view.php?aid=71948 Salmon management and marine observer lawsuits con], the Lotus were incredibly fast and pushing very hard,[http://www.paul-gerhardt-realschule-muenster.eu/wiki/index.php?title=Benutzer:Tmdklkvepsc Video- Women in Ohio kidnap case thank public for support], and Kimi was putting a lot of pressure on me at the end -- he was a bit quicker.
 It's incredible to win at home, a great relief. It's sweet to win here, but at the end it's just another race. I'm happy to take (the) win and score some points. 
Vettel had been without a win in Europe for 22 months and -- more obscurely -- had never won a race in July.
Vettel's 30th career victory extended his championship lead to 34 points over Ferrari driver Fernando Alonso, who finished fourth. Raikkonen moved up to third,[http://nvz8.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=121121 Live color blog- UNLV sends a howling crowd home happy with a 72], 41 points behind Vettel.
There were no tire blowouts but the race had its share of bizarre incidents,[http://wiki.sunyq.com/index.php?title=%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7:Kimberlyroch#Saltchuk_buys_Carlile.2C_adds_to_Alaska_freight_portfolio Saltchuk buys Carlile, adds to Alaska freight portfolio], including a loose wheel flying through the air in the pit lane and an abandoned car drifting on its own down the track. A cameraman fractured a shoulder and cracked a rib in the wheel accident.
Third place went to Romain Grosjean, Raikkonen's Lotus teammate.
Raikkonen went for his third and final pit stop with 10 laps remaining and overtook Grosjean five laps later, on team orders.
 Maybe we should have gambled, the tires were good, Raikkonen said about his late pit stop. I wonder if we should have gone to the end.
 But I had massive problem with the radio. I could hear the team but they couldn't hear me. 
Raikkonen and Vettel are friends off and on the track but were noncommittal when asked Sunday about driving for the same team.
 He is quite good at what he does. I respect him a lot but at the end it's not my decision, Vettel said.
Vettel and Red Bull teammate Mark Webber, who is leaving the team at the end of the season, got off to a flying start.
Vettel started second behind pole sitter Lewis Hamilton, with Webber right behind. Both flashed by the Mercedes driver on either side before the first curve.
But Webber lost his rear right wheel when he was released from his first pit stop too soon and finished seventh after dropping to the back of the field after the incident. The flying wheel struck British cameraman Paul Allen. He remained conscious and was treated at the circuit before being taken to a nearby hospital.
Red Bull was fined 38,[http://www.mayaziv.com/2013/08/vigil-for-sarah-guyard/ Vigil for Sarah Guyard],650 for releasing Webber too soon.
 I knew we had lost the tire in the pit stop of course, but not that someone got hit by it. That's bad and I hope he is OK, that's the main thing, said Webber.
Hamilton struggled with his tires and finished fifth as Mercedes again failed to live up to the promise of its fast qualifying performance.
While the tires held and made the threat of a drivers' boycott redundant, another scary incident took place when Jules Bianchi's Marussia spewed smoke and caught fire briefly. Bianchi got out of the car, which started freewheeling down the track on its own. There were no other cars coming as the driverless vehicle ended up on the grass, hit a trackside billboard and came to a halt as stewards rushed to control it.
That brought on the safety car for five laps, bringing the Lotus cars nearer to Vettel. But despite coming close, neither managed to get past the German.
The tires became an issue after a series of blowouts at last week's British Grand Prix, prompting drivers to threaten a pullout if the problems persisted in Germany.
Tire supplier Pirelli made some changes and the tires held,[http://www.richardsteiner.ch/w/index.php?title=Benutzer:Qgyljbglobh Gorman sophomore tight end Alize Jones already catching the], before the Italian manufacturer provides a new compound to be used for the first time at the next race in Hungary in three weeks' time.</html>

== Predictable reaction after latest EPA Pebble assessment ==

<html>This shows where the main Pebble deposit lies just west of Iliamna. The potential impact of the proposed copper and gold mine on the Bristol Bay watershed continues to be examined with the latest step a revised assessment released April 26 by the Environmental Protection Agency. Photos/Andrew Jensen/AJOC 
 Build-out of a large-scale mine near the headwaters of a world-class salmon fishery in Alaska could wipe out as many as 90 miles of streams and alter stream flows, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said in a revised assessment released April 26.
 The report said mining activity would claim at least 24 miles of streams in the Bristol Bay region, based on the scenarios evaluated, with the loss of wetlands ranging from 1,200 to 4,800 acres.
 The EPA focused on the Pebble deposit and took into account information related to the proposed Pebble Mine but also noted the potential for multiple mines in the region, given the resource base,[http://huzhenglan.gotoip4.com/plus/view.php?aid=16612 NY woman gets probation in illegal maid case], which it said would lead to further elimination or blocking of streams and wetland losses.
 EPA initiated the review process in response to concerns raised by tribes and others about the impact large-scale mining could have on Bristol Bay fisheries.
 Critics of the EPA review including the Pebble Limited Partnership, the group behind the proposed Pebble Mine fear it could lead to the agency vetoing mining activity in the region.
 Pebble Partnership CEO John Shively said the review was unnecessary, flawed and consistent with the demands of those who want to deny the Pebble Partnership the right to submit a permit application. 
 The Alaska Department of Law also issued a statement.
 We believe the assessment is premature, as well as any action EPA might take based upon it, the state agency said. Any consideration of impacts should be made within the context of an actual proposal and a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit application. 
 The Pebble Partnership has called the mine deposit one of the largest of its kind in the world, with the potential of producing 80.6 billion pounds of copper, 107.4 million ounces of gold and 5.6 billion pounds of molybdenum over decades.
 EPA regional administrator Dennis McLerran said the revised report generally affirms conclusions reached in the initial report last year while including more details on transportation corridors, possible culvert failures and other factors.
 It noted, for example, that culvert blockages or other failures would inhibit fish passage. It also said production of fish could be lost or diminished if blockages occurred during adult salmon immigration or juvenile salmon emigration and were not cleared for several days.
 Extended blockages aren t likely during mine operations, but there could be a greater impact once mine operations end, the report states.
 The report also noted that salmon could be affected by in-stream copper levels because leaching could occur during routine mine operations.
 Tailing storage facilities and dams to hold mine waste are likely to be in place for hundreds to thousands of years because there is no plan for removal when mining operations end, according to the report. A tailings dam failure could wipe out or degrade rivers and streams for decades,[http://studio100.info/Gebruiker:Skprzekoxkl#Kvitova_wins_first_Wimbledon_women.27s_title_over_Sharapova Kvitova wins first Wimbledon women's title over Sharapova], though the risk of that is considered fairly low, the report states.
 Conservationists said it was clear the mine would harm salmon and destroy streams, even if nothing ever goes wrong.
 Pebble is far bigger and more threatening to renewable resource jobs than any other mine proposal in Alaska and it s planned for the worst location possible, Tim Bristol, director of Trout Unlimited s Alaska program, said in a news release.
 The new report updates an assessment EPA released last year and is meant to address concerns that were raised about things like missing data and incomplete information.
 For example,[http://jenerick.com.ph/ MacKinnon, McDavid among invitees to WJHC summer camp], rather than using a hypothetical mine scenario, EPA said it drew from plans developed for Northern Dynasty Minerals, which has a stake in the proposed Pebble Mine; data collected by Pebble Limited Partnership; and its own experts to come up with three different mine scenarios.
 EPA said the scenarios realistically represent the type of development expected to happen in the Bristol Bay region. McLerran said it also accounts for modern mining practices. He said the focus has been on getting the science right so informed decisions can be made in the future.
 U.S. Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, said he opposes a pre-emptive veto of the Pebble Mine or other projects and added an open,[http://www.ce178.cn/plus/view.php?aid=19285 NBA Finals in Vegas- Heat victory tonight could me], public process that answers Alaskans questions and puts better science on the table is a good thing. 
 Fellow Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski called any attempt to prejudge Pebble unacceptable. 
 The permitting process exists for a reason and a federal agency can no more ignore the established process than can an applicant,[http://xiaoshuoyan.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1135759 Deputies- Vandalism suspect wore Spider], Murkowski said. If the EPA has concerns about the impact of a project there is an appropriate time to raise them after a permit application has been made,[http://qzrs2005.byethost15.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2781 Home run from Wilmer Flores helps 51s beat Tacoma], not before. It is clear to me that a preemptive veto of resource development is quite simply outside the legal authority that Congress intended to provide to of the EPA. I made that clear to the previous EPA administrator and I will make it clear to the current nominee, Gina McCarthy. 
 The revised assessment will undergo a new round of peer review and public comment before EPA releases a final report that could affect permitting decisions for the proposed mine. That final report is expected later this year.</html>