Voir le texte source

In fact, some would easily think that Sandy Berger got stiff penalties since his negotia.. For all intents and purposes, justice was served when Sandy Berger was fined $50,000 by U.S. Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson in her judgment on September 8, 2005 regarding Sandy Bergers mis-handling of classified documents. Furthermore, Sandy Berger may surrender his security clearance for 3 years following a ruling. Judges Robinsons decision was graciously accepted by sandy Berger. In reality, some would easily think that Sandy Berger got rigid penalties because his discussions with key prosecutor Noel Hillman and organization concerned only $10,000 in fine. His loss in protection license formulated the charges. General, Judge Robinsons choice made both Republicans and the Democrats, the Sandy Berger camp and the U.S Justice Department, excessively happy and relieved. A number of people both in the private sector and the government, but, do not believe the ruling was good at all. For these individuals, the fines assessed upon erring former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was much like mere a slap on the arm. For one therefore grave, the fine should have been stiffer and Sandy Berger should have been sent to jail. It was a criminal act in line with the law. The Sandy Berger camp got around declaring that what Berger committed was a simple violation of-the National Archives restrictions, nonetheless it was hardly a criminal act. In reality, however, what Berger did can easily be classified as a of Section 793 of Title 18 of the U.S Code. Under this section, deliberate dissemination of classified documents and materials is legal. Even random distribution of o-r losing classified components on account of gross negligence under this code is punishable by a good and/or imprisonment of at most 10-years. It was a hard thing for Bergers authorities to swallow that Sandy Berger got off therefore lightly when under this law, h-e has been sentenced 10-years. Critics still thought that Sandy Berger needs to have been fined AND charged for a period, even though nobody could really expect Berger to get the maximum. Sandy Berger deliberately removed the documents. Initially, Sandy Berger wouldnt admit to intentionally taking the documents in the National Archives.  [http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/4/prweb10668680.htm Sandy Chiropractor]  is a riveting resource for additional info about when to mull over this concept. He insisted, when he was initially asked by National Archives officers about missing files, that he accidentally put them in with his papers when he collected his things into his portfolio. He quickly came ultimately back these papers. But, after due investigation, it had been learned that Berger got more than those two copies. H-e actually got three more on the visit. He later admitted to reducing these up when he admitted to possess deliberately take-n the materials. Experts believed that even though they concede that Sandy Berger had no intention of analyzing the painful and sensitive information, they had no intention of conceding that Berger built an honest mistake. The fact that he is a National Security Advisor means in regards to classified materials that he knew correct methods and practices. Sandy Berger knew that nevertheless critical his interview with the 9/11 payment was, it was even more crucial to guard national security by following the National Archives laws about these documents. The undeniable fact that Berger deliberately set himself above the law must have merited greater than a hit on the hand but a wallop on the bottom.