Voir le texte source

In truth, some would easily think that Sandy Berger got hard penalties since his negotia.. For all intents and purposes, justice was served when Sandy Berger was fined $50,000 by U.S. Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson in her ruling on September 8, 2005 regarding Sandy Bergers mis-handling of classified documents. Furthermore, Sandy Berger will surrender his security clearance for 36 months after the ruling. Judges Robinsons decision was graciously accepted by sandy Berger. In-fact, some would easily think that Sandy Berger got rigid fines because his negotiations with key prosecutor Noel Hillman and organization concerned only $10,000 in fine. His loss in protection license formulated the penalties. General, Judge Robinsons decision made both the Republicans and the Democrats, the U.S Justice Department and the Sandy Berger camp, exceedingly happy and relieved. Identify extra info on an affiliated web site by browsing to  [http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/5/prweb10777758.htm Sandy Chiropractor] . Many people both in the government and the private-sector, nevertheless, do not think that the judgment was honest at all. For these folks, the charges levied upon erring former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was akin to pure a slap on the arm. For one therefore serious, the good should have been higher and Sandy Berger should have been sent to prison. It had been a criminal act in line with the law. The Sandy Berger camp got around saying that what Berger committed was a simple breach of the National Archives regulations, however it was scarcely a criminal act. In fact, however, what Berger did can quickly be categorized as a of Section 793 of Title 18 of the U.S Code. Under this section, deliberate dissemination of classified documents and materials is legal. Also accidental distribution of or dropping classified materials as a result of gross negligence under this rule is punishable by a great and/or imprisonment of at most ten years. It was a difficult thing for Bergers critics to swallow that Sandy Berger got off so lightly when under this law, he could have been sentenced 10 years. Critics still thought that Sandy Berger should have been fined AND imprisoned for a period, even though no-one can reasonably expect Berger to be provided with the full maximum. Sandy Berger deliberately removed the files. Initially, Sandy Berger wouldnt acknowledge to deliberately using the files from the National Archives. He insisted, when he was initially asked by National Archives officers about missing documents, when he collected his things into his collection that he inadvertently put them in with his papers. He promptly returned these papers. Nevertheless, after due investigation, it had been learned that Berger took a lot more than these two copies. H-e in reality got three more over a visit. He later admitted to reducing these up when he admitted to have deliberately take-n the materials. Experts thought that even when they acknowledge that Sandy Berger had no intention of examining the sensitive and painful information, they had no intention of conceding that Berger created an honest mistake. The very fact that he is a National Security Advisor suggests in regards to classified materials that he knew methods and proper methods. Sandy Berger knew that but critical his interview with the 9/11 percentage was, it was even more important to safeguard national security by following the National Archives rules about these files. The fact that Berger deliberately set himself above the law must have merited higher than a hit on the arm but a wallop on the bottom.