Voir le texte source
De WikiCinéjeu.
pour
Motion picture Assessment: In Time (2011)
Aller à :
Navigation
,
rechercher
Shortly following the initial [http://string0crib.livejournal.com/653.html Movie Reviews - As Good As Lifeless] confrontation with his landlord he is paid out a take a look at by two men, he assumes they are with his landlord and doesn't open the doorway, they appear back again afterwards and trap Ethan in his flat. In Time utilizes an interesting principle that also can make it inherently difficult to digest. The notion that time alone is the only currency isn't the challenging aspect to grasp - it is the way that folks distribute it among themselves that raises concerns. The movie foregoes most explanation, which most likely assists to blanket the doubtful events, but also forces the discerning viewer to decide aside far more than they might have performed or else. At the very least the suspenseful adventure that the film prioritizes offers sound amusement and heightened immediacy - just as long as the film's running time doesn't outlast your suspension of disbelief. In a futuristic globe wherever time is the most worthwhile commodity, Will Salas (Justin Timberlake) finds himself the recipient of a staggering sum from a "rich" stranger who no lengthier values his overabundance of time - his clear immortality. With dangerous robbers that rule the ghettos intent on buying his new inheritance, and a "Timekeeper" police officer (Cillian Murphy) hot on his path, Will kidnaps Sylvia Weis (Amanda Seyfried), the daughter of a highly effective finance magnate, to support in his plan to restore harmony to a corrupt process and its tyrannical keep more than human lifetime. The nouveau riche embarks on significant-stakes games of probability and flights from the authorities, intent on dwelling just about every minute to the fullest and redistributing the unbalanced societal prosperity. The film has a premise that is just also silly for its individual great (which incidentally lifted a plagiarism lawsuit by author Harlan Ellison, stating that the plot is primarily based on his award-winning 1965 small tale, "Repent, Harlequin!" Explained the Ticktockman). Even though the story could have been approached with increased sincerity, writer/director Andrew Niccol wasn't extremely concerned with recreating the darkish, contemplative, believable science-fiction tone of his much more brilliant, before get the job done Gattaca (1997). This piece is too polished, bright, cold, predicament-totally free and pumped with Hollywood stars and glamor to set up a truly dystopian/totalitarian potential, ruled by Matrix-like cops and the youthful upper crust. Resultantly, the accidental laughs occur really regularly, even however comic aid is purposely inserted and time-is-cash puns and jokes are current (Wilde is a mother, coffee charges 4 minutes, fifty nine many years... furthermore tax for a good ride, the corner developing is a 99 Next store). The setting doesn't get a visible update to match the genetic technology developments, but the cinematography is nonetheless effective. The movie is by Roland Emmerich and it [http://string9pig.blogs.experienceproject.com/2191885.html Movie Evaluation: Nameless] is anything that is quite controversial. "Appaloosa" the cowboy shift, with Viggo Mortensen, Ed Harris in it is a worthy of when transfer, and Renee Zellweger performs a worthwhile part, [http://www.nexopia.com/users/bit5ice/blog/1-motion-picture-assessment-the-best-of-the-greatest-films-for-12009 Motion picture Critique: Anonymous] truly her aspect remained me of an individual in my youth, alongside with Jeremy Irons.
Revenir à la page
Motion picture Assessment: In Time (2011)
.
Affichages
Page
Discussion
Voir le texte source
Historique
Outils personnels
Créer un compte ou se connecter
Navigation
Accueil
Cinéjeu
Forum
Modifications récentes
Page au hasard
Aide
Rechercher
Boîte à outils
Pages liées
Suivi des pages liées
Pages spéciales