Voir le texte source

But it is a term much more readily heard in the media nowadays promulgated by the nations defense planners and employed fairly frequently in reference to the war on terrorism. Asymmetric warfare is just the application of distinctive, inventive, and unconventional techniques with the intention to defeat a numerically and technologically superior enemy. It takes several forms which includes combat and p... Asymmetric warfare is as alien to typical 21st century Americans as the Martian landscape. Yet it is a term a lot more readily heard in the media these days promulgated by the nations defense planners and utilized very often in reference to the war on terrorism. Asymmetric warfare is merely the application of special, inventive, and unconventional methods with the intention to defeat a numerically and technologically superior enemy. It requires numerous types which includes combat and psychological warfare. The 9/11 attacks and bombing of the U.S.S Cole have been examples of applying this kind of warfare as were the recent verbal assaults by Venezuelan and Iranian presidents upon the United States at the UN. Though asymmetric warfare has its roots as far back as the Trojan Campaign in Ancient Greece and Hannibals assault on Rome, it was Americans that brought it to a fine art form, if not a pure science. Some have mentioned that asymmetric warfare is as American as apple pie. Really couple of military historians would dispute that the Continental Army of the Revolutionary War and the Army of Northern Virginia in the course of the Civil War fostered types of asymmetric war at its ideal.  [http://combatarmshacks.blogspot.com/ ca cheat]  The guerrillas Francis Marion (the Swamp Fox) and Daniel Morgan (hero of the Cow Pens) drove Basic Cornwallis from South Carolina. On a a lot grander scale General Washingtons victory at Trenton was a fine example of this type of warfare. So was Stonewall Jacksons Valley of Virginia Campaign and John Mosbys exploits during the Civil War, not to mention Douglas MacArthurs island hopping campaign throughout Planet War II. A main component of the new Rumsfeld Doctrine embraces the notion of asymmetric warfare to such a higher degree that it is changing Americans worldwide defense posture on a radical basis. It is no secret that best brass within the Pentagon and the Defense Secretary are locking horns over the situation on a really frequent basis, not to mention a horde of retired generals raising alarm bells. Our leaders inform us that asymmetric warfare is a new and unproven field of military endeavor utilized by terrorist cells and terrorist nations bent on our destruction. That we dont fully comprehend and grasp the nature of the Islamic fundamentalist mind -- and have in no way faced such a determined or fanatical foe. Someone wants to tell that to the boys who served on these aircraft carriers in the South Pacific for the duration of Globe War II. These Japanese kamikazes and kaitens had been just as committed to their Emperor as Islamic fundamentalists are to Allah. We could not quit these crazed Japanese prepared to sacrifice their lives in the name of their trigger and neither can we cease the devoted Islamic radicals bent on attacking our homeland. The distinction nowadays is theres no Harry Truman at the helm. That basic farmer from Missouri knew the head of the octopus had to be crushed in order to cease the carnage getting inflicted in the central and south pacific theaters of war.  [http://bad-company-2-hacks.blogspot.com/2012/08/bad-company-2-cheat-on-sale.html check out bad company 2 hack]  So he did --- very speedily and properly.  [http://thewarzhack.blogspot.com/2013/03/new-warz-hacks-release.html tell us what you think]  And this begs the question. How lengthy are American leaders going to let terrorist oriented nation-states to finance and use asymmetric warfare --- by way of their proxy organizations such as al-Qaeda --- against the United States and continue to divert attention from the far more critical strategic problems at hand, such as the developing Chinese threat? Some say it is a diversionary ploy developed to shift the publics consideration away from other pressing concerns such the atmosphere, trade concerns, job losses, and income stagnation.  [http://combatarmshacks.blogspot.com/2013/03/ca-hack-with-opk-and-more.html official website]  The Bush Administration desires us to think the war on terror is a multi-decade long struggle requiring a harmful redeployment of American defense resources away from cold war postures. U.S. leadership has an intimate understanding of asymmetric warfare. If it does not interdict the use of this lethal type of tactical warfare against Americas important interest instantly, making use of whatever implies necessary at its disposal --- nonetheless ugly --- it will ultimately have a extremely damaging impact on both the financial and military institutions of the nation and a profound influence on its political stability as nicely. And possibly thats what our enemies want soon after all. And then the octopuses of the planet will eat that apple pie for desert.