Voir le texte source

If you are perhaps not active in the search engine marketing area, January 21st, 2007 probably held no value for you. Visit  [http://blog.yam.com/mousecoil16/article/68860464 rate us]  to read why to provide for it. However, if you are a search engine marketer or SEO, you probably remember January 21st while the time that Wikipedia died. To the untrained eye, Wikipedia is strictly the exact same today as it was six months ago. To get another viewpoint, we recommend you check-out:  [http://www.cheapoakleysunglassescheap.com/each-fascination-primarily-based-on-your-content-material/ like] . But, after you take a peek and get below the top, you can see one difference that's had an effect on the world of search engine optimization: NOFOLLOW. Browse here at  [http://lf158.com/blog/understand-search-engine-marketing-techniques/ Understand Search Engine Marketing Techniques | Wordpress]  to compare why to deal with this viewpoint. In the language of Matt Cutts, 'rel='nofollow' capability is an easy way for a site to tell search engines the web site cant or doesnt want to vouch for a link.' Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was mainly used for blog comments. That served weblog owners cut down on comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also used in some situations to represent a link, but this can be a whole other controversy that may need to be stored for another post. This cogent  [http://blog.yam.com/beastweeder38/article/68838380 beastweeder38 's blog: Search Engine Marketing Just How To - yam天空部落]  portfolio has several thrilling warnings for how to provide for this idea. The reason that Wikipedias use of NOFOLLOW on each outgoing link caused such a mix is basically because lots of people considered it as probably the most hypocritical choice that Wikipedia could have made. The reason that Wikipedia is becoming so popular and works so well in the SERPs is that writers and site owners normally research Wikipedia. When they do that, they give a link back to Wikipedia. Every time this process occurs, Wikipedia gets a little more acceptance in the search-engines. They're showing the search engines that even though we reference a web site and may use material from it within our article, we do not want you to give it any credit, when Wikipedia decided to apply the NOFOLLOW tag. It is for this reason that lots of have started to view as a hypocrisy Wikipedia. Wikipedia might have chosen an alternative method for fighting spam that did not punish quality web sites which deserve to be acknowledged by Wikipedia, even though NOFOLLOW has probably cut down on the amount of spam Wikipedia has to combat, but as numerous others have mentioned.